Toughskin Case For Apple iPhone Xs Max - Black - On Sale

Only at Best BuySave your phone from drops and dings with this Presidio TOUGHSKIN case for Apple iPhone XS Max. Constructed to be slim and fit easily in a pocket, this sturdy case boasts 2x military-grade drop defense alongside a raised bezel for reliable screen protection. Slip this Presidio TOUGHSKIN on your phone and keep it firmly in hand with forward-thinking ridges along the side.

The Samsung gadgets that Apple says infringe are the Admire, Galaxy Nexus , Galaxy Note , Galaxy Note 2, Galaxy S2, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy SII Skyrocket, Galaxy S3, Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, and the Stratosphere. Samsung, meanwhile, says the iPhone 4 , iPhone 4S , iPhone 5, iPod Touch (fifth generation) and iPod Touch (fourth generation) all infringe. It initially accused the iPad 2 , iPad 3, iPad 4, and iPad Mini of infringing its '239 patent, but it later dropped those claims. That also reduced the amount Samsung wanted in damages to $6.2 million from its originally requested $6.8 million.

The latest trial kicked off March 31 with jury selection, The following day featured opening arguments and testimony by Phil Schiller, Apple's head of marketing, Other witnesses who have testified include Greg Christie, an Apple engineer who invented the slide-to-unlock iPhone toughskin case for apple iphone xs max - black feature; Thomas Deniau, a France-based Apple engineer who helped develop the company's quick link technology; and Justin Denison, chief strategy officer of Samsung Telecommunications America, Denison's testimony came via a deposition video..

Apple experts who took the stand over the course of the trial included Andrew Cockburn, a professor of computer science and software engineering at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand; and Alex Snoeren, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of California at San Diego. The crux of Apple's case came with two expert witnesses, John Hauser, the Kirin professor of marketing at the MIT Sloan School of Management; and Christopher Vellturo, an economist and principal at consultancy Quantitative Economic Solutions. Hauser conducted a conjoint study that determined Apple's patented features made Samsung's devices more appealing, while Vellturo determined the amount of damages Apple should be due for Samsung's infringement -- $2.191 billion.

Samsung, which launched its defense April 11 after Apple rested its case, called several Google engineers to the stand to testify about the early days of Android and technology they created before Apple received its patents, Hiroshi Lockheimer, Google vice president of engineering for Android, said his company never copied iPhone features for Android, Other Google Android engineers, Bjorn Bringert and Dianne Hackborn, also testified about features of the operating system, High-ranking Samsung executives, including former Samsung Telecommunications America CEO Dale Sohn and STA Chief Marketing Officer Todd Pendleton, also took the stand during the month-long trial, The toughskin case for apple iphone xs max - black two executives testified about Samsung's marketing push for the Galaxy S2 and other devices, saying a shift in the Korean company's sales and marketing efforts -- not copying Apple -- boosted its position in the smartphone market..

The latter half of the trial largely was experts hired by Samsung to dispute the validity of Apple's patents and to argue that Samsung didn't infringe. The experts include Martin Rinard, an MIT professor of computer science; Saul Greenberg, a professor of human computer interaction at the University of Calgary in Canada; and Daniel Wigdor, a computer science professor at the University of Toronto. David Reibstein, chaired professor of marketing at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business, refuted Apple expert Hauser's testimony from earlier this month. NYU Stern School of Business professor Tulin Erdem, meanwhile, also testified that she conducted her own studies, using eye tracking, to determine what devices consumers would buy. She concluded that Apple's patented features didn't boost desire for Samsung's products.

Judith Chevalier, a professor of economics and finance at the Yale University School of Management who was hired by Samsung, said her analysis determined that a reasonable royalty for Samsung's assumed infringement would be $1.75 per device, or $38.4 million overall, Apple had argued it deserved $40 per device for infringement as well as lost profits for a total of $2.191 billion, After presenting its defense, Samsung on April 21 launched its own infringement suit against Apple, Dan Schonfeld, a professor of computer science at the University of Illinois at Chicago, then testified that Apple infringed the '239 patent in its iPhone through the use of FaceTime and a feature for attaching video to messages and mail, And Ken Parulski, another expert who was part of the Kodak team toughskin case for apple iphone xs max - black that developed the world's first color digital camera, testified that Apple infringed another Samsung patent for organizing video and photos in folders..

James Storer, a professor of computer science at Brandeis University hired by Apple as an expert witness, then testified April 22 that Apple didn't infringe Samsung's patents. The company then called witnesses such as Apple engineers Tim Millet and Roberto Garcia to testify about the creation of technology used in iPhones and iPads. Millet serves as senior director of platform architecture at Apple, helping create the processors that power iOS devices. Garcia, meanwhile talked about the creation of the FaceTime technology that has been accused of infringing a Samsung patent.

Apple and Samsung will present their closing arguments Tuesday, and then the case will be handed to the jury of four men and four women, The jury -- toughskin case for apple iphone xs max - black made of tech novices such as a police officer and a retired teacher who likes salsa dancing -- will deliberate every business day until it has a verdict, Closing arguments in the patent-infringement case between the world's two largest smartphone makers will take place Tuesday, Then it's up to the eight-person jury in the San Jose, Calif, federal court to decide who prevails..

Recent Posts