Lovecases Marble iPhone 8 Plus / 7 Plus Case - Dream Pink Reviews - On Sale

Enhance and protect your iPhone 8 Plus / 7 Plus with this glamorous dream pink case from LoveCases. Your iPhone fits perfectly into the durable frame, while a classical marble design adds a touch of historic prestige to your already-gorgeous device.

To see what patents each Samsung device is accused of infringing (denoted by an X), and what patents the jury ultimately decided Samsung did violate (denoted by an asterisked X*), refer to the chart below. Outlined below are the Apple devices the jury deemed guilty of patent violation. How long did the trial last?. The case kicked off March 31 with jury selection and wrapped up May 5. Court was in session Mondays, Tuesdays, and Fridays throughout the month of April, with the companies granted a total of 52 hours of testimony, three hours of opening arguments, and four hours of closings. The jury started its deliberations late in the day April 29. It reached a verdict at the end of the day May 2, but Judge Koh recalled the jury May 5 to recalculate one of the damages figures.

What did the jury miscalculate?, It had awarded Apple no damages for one version of the Galaxy S2, but Apple believed it should be awarded some money for Samsung's infringement of the '172 patent, The jury lovecases marble iphone 8 plus / 7 plus case - dream pink reviews had granted Apple $4.02 million for the Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch and $5.8 million for the Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, After reconsidering the figures, the jury shuffled around damages awarded to each of the Galaxy S2 models but didn't change the total, The jury foreman, Tom Dunham, said it was a "clerical error."Who won?..

That's tricky. Both companies were found guilty of infringing some of each other's patents and ordered to pay damages. Ultimately, it wasn't a clear-cut win for either company, but the verdict also wasn't the overwhelming defeat Samsung faced in 2012. By awarding Apple less than 10 percent of the damages it wanted, the jury of mostly tech novices, which deliberated for three full days after a four-week trial, sent a much different message than the prior trial that netted Apple nearly $1 billion. Samsung surely feels relieved by the outcome, though it still was deemed a copycat in some respects. And Apple, which was vindicated in some of its accusations, probably believes Samsung's punishment is too light.

How much money was involved?, The jury ordered Samsung to pay $119.6 million for infringing three of Apple's five patents, much less than the $2.2 billion the iPhone maker had demanded, At the same time, Apple was ordered to pay Samsung $158,400 for infringing one of the Korean company's two patents, Samsung had asked for $6.2 million in damages, and it had argued that if it had infringed all of Apple's patents, it only owed $38.4 million, While the companies asked for damages, the case was about more than money, What's really at stake is the market for mobile devices, Apple now gets two-thirds lovecases marble iphone 8 plus / 7 plus case - dream pink reviews of its sales from the iPhone and iPad; South Korea-based Samsung is the world's largest maker of smartphones; and both want to keep dominating the market..

How did the companies react to the verdict?. Apple said Friday, following the verdict. "Today's ruling reinforces what courts around the world have already found: that Samsung willfully stole our ideas and copied our products. We are fighting to defend the hard work that goes into beloved products like the iPhone, which our employees devote their lives to designing and delivering for our customers."Samsung said Monday, following the jury recalculation. "We agree with the jury's decision to reject Apple's grossly exaggerated damages claim. Although we are disappointed by the finding of infringement, we are vindicated that for the second time in the US, Apple has been found to infringe Samsung's patents. It is our long history of innovation and commitment to consumer choice, that has driven us to become the leader in the mobile industry today."What role did Google play in all of this?.

Samsung argued during the trial that most features Apple said infringed were part of Android, Google's mobile operating system that powers Samsung's devices, All patents except one, called "slide to unlock," are built into Android, the Korean company said, and it accused Apple of attacking Android, Apple argued that the patent infringement trial had nothing to do with Android, It came out during the trial, however, that Google was helping Samsung with its defense for two patents, '414 for background syncing and '959 for universal search, Those patents lovecases marble iphone 8 plus / 7 plus case - dream pink reviews wielded by Apple directly target features of Android that Google developed, including the Google search box and Gmail, The other patents target features that can be tweaked by handset makers or by the Android open source community..

The jury determined that Samsung had not infringed the '414 and '959 patents but that it did infringe Apple's three other patents. The jury said Google didn't factor into its decision for infringement or damages, but it believed Apple and Google needed to battle directly instead of involve handset makers such as Samsung. "I guess if you really feel that Google is something that's the cause behind this, as I think everybody observed, then don't beat around the bush," said jury foreman Tom Dunham, a retired IBM software executive. "The fact is Apple has [intellectual property] they believe in. So does Samsung. So does Google. Let the courts decide, but a more direct approach might be something to think about."Why doesn't Apple sue Google?.

Suing Google wouldn't get Apple far since Google doesn't make its own phones or tablets and gives away its operating system for free, Instead, Apple has sued companies that sell physical devices using Android, a rival to Apple's iOS mobile operating system, In particular, Apple believes Samsung has followed a strategy to copy its products and then undercut Apple's pricing, For Apple, it's easier to point lovecases marble iphone 8 plus / 7 plus case - dream pink reviews fingers at the handset makers who generate revenue and profit off of Android phones, rather than Google, which only indirectly generates revenue through mobile advertising and services, It's also easier to display an iPhone next to a Galaxy device and show the similarities and describe how the iPhone predated other rival smartphones, Work had started on Android before the iPhone launched, making it harder to persuade a jury that Google was a copycat..



Recent Posts